Creative destruction in science

Open

Warren Tierney, Jay H. Hardy, Charles R. Ebersole, Keith Leavitt, Domenico Viganola, Elena Giulia Clemente, Michael Gordon, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, Thomas Pfeiffer, Eric Luis Uhlmann, Ajay T. Abraham, Matus Adamkovic, Jais Adam-Troian, Rahul Anand, Kelly J. Arbeau, Eli C. Awtrey, Ofer H. Azar, Štěpán Bahník, Gabriel Baník, Ana Barbosa Mendes, Michael M. Barger, Ernest Baskin, Jozef Bavolar, Ruud M.W.J. Berkers, Randy Besco, Michał Białek, Michael M. Bishop, Helena Bonache, Sabah Boufkhed, Mark J. Brandt, Max E. Butterfield, Nick Byrd, Neil R. Caton, Michelle L. Ceynar, Mike Corcoran, Thomas H. Costello, Leslie D. Cramblet Alvarez, Jamie Cummins, Oliver S. Curry, David P. Daniels, Lea L. Daskalo, Liora Daum-Avital, Martin V. Day, Matthew D. Deeg, Tara C. Dennehy, Erik Dietl, Eugen Dimant, Artur Domurat, Christilene du Plessis, Dmitrii Dubrov, Mahmoud M. Elsherif, Yuval Engel, Martin R. Fellenz, Sarahanne M. Field, Mustafa Firat, Raquel M.K. Freitag, Enav Friedmann, Omid Ghasemi, Matthew H. Goldberg, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, Jennifer A. Griffith, Dmitry Grigoryev, Sebastian Hafenbrädl, David Hagmann, Andrew H. Hales, Hyemin Han, Jason L. Harman, Andree Hartanto, Benjamin C. Holding, Astrid Hopfensitz, Joachim Hüffmeier, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger, Katarzyna Idzikowska, Ase H. Innes-Ker, Bastian Jaeger, Kristin Jankowsky, Shoshana N. Jarvis, Nilotpal Jha, David Jimenez-Gomez, Daniel Jolles, Bibiana Jozefiakova, Pavol Kačmár, Jozef Šafárik, Mariska Kappmeier, Matthias Kasper, Lucas Keller, Viktorija Knapic, Mikael Knutsson, Olga Kombeiz, Marta Kowal, Goedele Krekels, Tei Laine, Daniel Lakens, Bingjie Li, Ronda F. Lo, Jonas Ludwig, James C. Marcus, Melvin S. Marsh, Mario Martinoli, Marcel Martončik, Allison Master, Theodore C. Masters-Waage, Lewend Mayiwar, Jens Mazei, Randy J. McCarthy, Gemma S. McCarthy, Stephanie Mertens, Leticia Micheli, Marta Miklikowska, Talya Miron-Shatz, Andres Montealegre, David Moreau, Carmen Moret-Tatay, Marcello Negrini, Philip W.S. Newall, Gustav Nilsonne, Paweł Niszczota, Nurit Nobel, Aoife O'Mahony, Mehmet A. Orhan, Deirdre O'Shea, Flora E. Oswald, Miriam Panning, Peter C. Pantelis, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Mogens Jin Pedersen, Gordon Pennycook, Ori Plonsky, Vince Polito, Paul C. Price, Maximilian A. Primbs, John Protzko, Michael Quayle, Rima-Maria Rahal, Md. Shahinoor Rahman, Liz Redford, Niv Reggev, Caleb J. Reynolds, Marta Roczniewska, Ivan Ropovik, Robert M. Ross, Thomas J. Roulet, Andrea May Rowe, Silvia Saccardo, Margaret Samahita, Michael Schaerer, Joyce Elena Schleu, Brendan A. Schuetze, Ulrike Senftleben, Raffaello Seri, Zeev Shtudiner, Jack Shuai, Ray Sin, Varsha Singh, Aneeha Singh, Tatiana Sokolova, Victoria Song, Tom Stafford, Natalia Stanulewicz, Samantha M. Stevens, Eirik Strømland, Samantha Stronge, Kevin P. Sweeney, David Tannenbaum, Stephanie J. Tepper, Kian Siong Tey, Hsuchi Ting, Ian W. Tingen, Ana Todorovic, Hannah M.Y. Tse, Joshua M. Tybur, Gerald H. Vineyard, Alisa Voslinsky, Marek A. Vranka, Jonathan Wai, Alexander C. Walker, Laura E. Wallace, Tianlin Wang, Johanna M. Werz, Jan K. Woike, Conny E. Wollbrant, Joshua D. Wright, Sherry J. Wu, Qinyu Xiao, Paolo Barretto Yaranon, Siu Kit Yeung, Sangsuk Yoon, Karen Yu, Meltem Yucel, Ignazio Ziano, Ro'i Zultan, Camilla S. Øverup

2020 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol. 161 Article Cited by 49 Quartile

Abstract

Drawing on the concept of a gale of creative destruction in a capitalistic economy, we argue that initiatives to assess the robustness of findings in the organizational literature should aim to simultaneously test competing ideas operating in the same theoretical space. In other words, replication efforts should seek not just to support or question the original findings, but also to replace them with revised, stronger theories with greater explanatory power. Achieving this will typically require adding new measures, conditions, and subject populations to research designs, in order to carry out conceptual tests of multiple theories in addition to directly replicating the original findings. To illustrate the value of the creative destruction approach for theory pruning in organizational scholarship, we describe recent replication initiatives re-examining culture and work morality, working parents’ reasoning about day care options, and gender discrimination in hiring decisions. Significance statement: It is becoming increasingly clear that many, if not most, published research findings across scientific fields are not readily replicable when the same method is repeated. Although extremely valuable, failed replications risk leaving a theoretical void— reducing confidence the original theoretical prediction is true, but not replacing it with positive evidence in favor of an alternative theory. We introduce the creative destruction approach to replication, which combines theory pruning methods from the field of management with emerging best practices from the open science movement, with the aim of making replications as generative as possible. In effect, we advocate for a Replication 2.0 movement in which the goal shifts from checking on the reliability of past findings to actively engaging in competitive theory testing and theory building. Scientific transparency statement: The materials, code, and data for this article are posted publicly on the Open Science Framework, with links provided in the article. © 2020 The Author(s)

Affiliations

INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore; Oregon State University, United States; University of Virginia, United States; World Bank; Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden; Massey University, New Zealand; University of Innsbruck, Austria; Seattle University, United States; Institute of Social Sciences CSPS, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Presov, Slovakia; American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Aarhus BSS, Denmark; Trinity Western University, Canada; University of Cincinnati, United States; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, Czech Republic; University of Presov, Slovakia; ITEC, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium; University of Georgia, United States; Saint Joseph's University, United States; Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Slovakia; Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany; University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, Poland; Universidad de La Laguna, Spain; King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg University, Netherlands; Point Loma Nazarene University, United States; Stevens Institute of Technology; University of Queensland, Australia; Pacific Lutheran University, United States; University of Missouri, United States; Emory University, United States; University of Denver, United States; Ghent University, Belgium; University of Oxford, United Kingdom; National University of Singapore, Singapore; Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada; University of Kansas, United States; University of British Columbia, Canada; Loughborough University, United Kingdom; University of Pennsylvania, United States; Centre for Economic Psychology and Decision Sciences, Kozminski University, Poland; Singapore Management University, Singapore; National Research University Higher School of Economics; University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; University of Groningen, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Canada; Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia; Yale University, United States; Kingston University London, United Kingdom; ESCP Business School; University of New Hampshire, United States; IESE Business School; Harvard Kennedy School, United States; University of Alabama, United States; Louisiana State University, United States; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Toulouse School of Economics, France; Institute of Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Germany; Loyola University Chicago, United States; Lund University, Sweden; University of Kassel, Germany; Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Fundamentos de Análisis Económico (FAE), University of Alicante, Spain; University of Essex, United Kingdom; Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Pavol; University in Košice, Slovakia; University of Otago, New Zealand; Tulane University, United States; University of Vienna, Austria; Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; University of Rijeka, Croatia; Linköping University, Sweden; Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Poland; IESEG; Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands; Warwick Business School, United Kingdom; York University, Canada; University of Würzburg, Germany; Evidera; Georgia Southern University, United States; DiECO, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Italy; University of Presov, Faculty of Arts, Institute of Psychology, Slovakia; University of Washington, United States; University of Houston, United States; Department of Leadership and Organizational Behavior, BI Norwegian Business School, Norway; Northern Illinois University, United States; University of Limerick, Ireland; Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Maastricht University, Netherlands; Umeå University, Sweden; Ono Academic College; Cornell University, United States; University of Auckland, New Zealand; Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Spain; CQUniversity; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm University, Sweden; Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland; School of Psychology, Cardiff University, United Kingdom; PSB Paris School of Business, France; Pennsylvania State University, United States; Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland; University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Regina, Canada; Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel; Macquarie University, Australia; California State University, Fresno, United States; Radboud University, Netherlands; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, United States; University of Chittagong, Bangladesh; Healthy Minds Innovations, Inc.; Department of Psychology, Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; Department of Psychology, Florida State University, United States; SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, LIME Department, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Faculty of Education, Institute for Research and Development of Education, Charles University, Czech Republic; Faculty of Education, University of Presov, Slovakia; Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Australia; University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Carnegie Mellon University, United States; University College Dublin, Ireland; University of Texas at Austin, United States; Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; CORG, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Ariel University, Israel; University of Toledo, United States; Early Warning Services; Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India; International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX); Fordham University, United States; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom; De Montfort University, United Kingdom; University of Bergen, Norway; Western Kentucky University, United States; University of Utah, United States; Goldman Sachs; Tingen Industries; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Sami Shamoon Academic College of Engineering; University of Arkansas, United States; University of Waterloo, Canada; Ohio State University, United States; University at Albany-SUNY, United States; RWTH Aachen University, Germany; University of Plymouth, United Kingdom; University of Stirling, United Kingdom; Simon Fraser University, Canada; University of California-Los Angeles, United States; University of Dayton, United States; Sewanee: The University of the South, United States; Grenoble Ecole de Management, F-38000, France; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany